What type of assessment helps determine students' silent reading comprehension?

The maze assessment is specifically designed to gauge students' silent reading comprehension by requiring them to read a passage and then fill in missing words or phrases. This format not only tests the students' understanding of the text but also their ability to use contextual clues to infer correct words, which is a crucial aspect of comprehension. As students engage with the passage, they must process the information silently and actively, allowing educators to evaluate their comprehension skills in a focused manner.

Other types of assessments, like visualizing or peer assessments, may not directly measure silent reading comprehension effectively. Visualizing assessments typically involve students creating mental images based on text, which, while valuable, does not assess comprehension in a straightforward way. Peer assessment relies on students critiquing each other’s work, which can provide insights into understanding but is more about social learning than silent reading skills. Comparative assessments evaluate understanding against a standard or another group's performance rather than assessing individual comprehension directly. Therefore, the maze assessment is the most appropriate method among the choices provided for determining silent reading comprehension.