Which measures are considered qualitative when assessing text complexity?

The choice highlighting levels of meaning or purpose, structure, clarity, and knowledge demands is the correct response because these criteria focus on the intrinsic qualities of a text that impact its complexity. Qualitative measures evaluate how the content is constructed and how it communicates ideas, rather than numerical or easily quantifiable characteristics.

For instance, the depth of meaning relates to how layered or straightforward a text's message is, affecting comprehension and engagement. Structure pertains to how the text is organized, which can influence the reader's ability to follow along and interpret the information. Clarity assesses whether the language is accessible and comprehensible, and knowledge demands refer to the prior knowledge a reader must have to grasp the text fully.

Other options provide quantitative measures, such as word counts and reading levels, which gauge complexity through numerical data rather than thematic depth or instructional effectiveness. These elements are important but do not fall under the category of qualitative assessment, which delves deeper into the text’s attributes that affect reader interaction and understanding.